Talk:Circle (company)

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

10mbt (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... enough references from independent reliable sources to require a WP:AFD discussion. ---- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 07:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR can you expand as it looks like an COI advert to me, no prejudice against a rewrite when not WP:TOOSOON. (please reply at AfD). Widefox; talk 10:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

actual current definition of WP:GNG seems easily satisfied

So does WP:42, seem to be equally easily satisfied. So does the especially-strict WP:NSOFT (and WP:109PAPERS) seem easily satisfied, which are *guidelines* that suggest counting each burst of coverage as 'one' single source.

Oct'13 and Nov'13.

Mar'14.

May'14.

Sep'14.

Dec'14.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/ex-jpmorgan-executive-to-join-circle-a-digital-currency-start-up/

Jan'15.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-15/bitcoin-may-succeed-as-software-not-medium-of-exchange

Feb'15.

http://www.engadget.com/2015/02/11/circle-bitcoin-android-wear/

Apr'15 and May'15.

I stopped after the first hundred hits or so on WP:GOOG at bing.com via yahoo's collation ... probably these are just the MAJOR and easily available WP:SOURCES that WP:ANYONE could dig up with a few minutes of effort... per WP:CHOICE of course. So depending on how strictly we count, that's either eight sources by coverage-burst, or by publisher-count, or something like 42 sources by the usual method of counting each URL once. WP:42 does *not* mean 42 sources are needed, but in this case, we do seem to actually have that many. Wiki-tradition is that three WP:SOURCES is enough to satisfy WP:GNG, if memory serves. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on current business model

As per subject, the article contains nothing on how it makes money. There are no fees to transfer money (in, out, or between users), foreign exchange is done at mid-market rates, and it's no longer holding onto people's bitcoins. Presumably there is a revenue stream somewhere. Lovingboth (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sold to Chinese Investor

it says here the company has been sold by circle to Chinese investors, it is no longer a US company. https://cointelegraph.com/news/tron-founder-justin-sun-admits-investment-in-crypto-exchange-poloniex

72.53.248.45 (talk) 04:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please find a reliable source. Coindesk and Cointelegraph are not reliable sources for Wikipedia. Retimuko (talk) 05:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Article

Would be great if a knowledgeable person could rewrite the overview section and make clear what the company currently does. Past activities could be placed into a History section. From reading it seems the company is a peer-to-peer (fiat) money transfer service. Except later on it says it abandoned that. Or that it was a cryptocurrency wallet and/or transfer service, except that it then says it moved away from crypto. And then moved back into crypto. And that maybe it's owned by the Chinese, but it's based in Boston. Or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellmaker (talk • contribs) 12:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit

I saw that in 2022 a significant patent infringement lawsuit was launched against Circle. Is this something that should be added to the entry at this stage? Or maybe only if it evolves further? Not sure what the standard is for lawsuits in general. Source - https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/circle-is-latest-crypto-company-sued-over-digital-trading-patent-2022-12-30/ Vivocj (talk) 20:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

I am curious what other editors think of the "Criticism" section on this page. It seems like it is only promoting Matt Taibbi and his article rather than explaining the business practices of Circle? Is this content necessary? Or does this section need to be expanded? BridgeCityBoyz (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]